<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knowledge Of The Book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/</link>
	<description>The Pensieve of a Mindless Guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:19:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shaadi: Life Ki Barbaadi! &#124; Tea Break</title>
		<link>http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/comment-page-3/#comment-10940</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaadi: Life Ki Barbaadi! &#124; Tea Break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=762#comment-10940</guid>
		<description>[...] 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Animal Humor 1 &#124; Tea Break</title>
		<link>http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/comment-page-3/#comment-10033</link>
		<dc:creator>Animal Humor 1 &#124; Tea Break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=762#comment-10033</guid>
		<description>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (103) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (103) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Don’t Need To Be… &#124; Tea Break</title>
		<link>http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/comment-page-3/#comment-9931</link>
		<dc:creator>I Don’t Need To Be… &#124; Tea Break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 03:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=762#comment-9931</guid>
		<description>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (102) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (102) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 &#124; Tea Break</title>
		<link>http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/comment-page-3/#comment-9857</link>
		<dc:creator>5 &#124; Tea Break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=762#comment-9857</guid>
		<description>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (101) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (101) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awesome Reply &#124; Tea Break</title>
		<link>http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/comment-page-3/#comment-9824</link>
		<dc:creator>Awesome Reply &#124; Tea Break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=762#comment-9824</guid>
		<description>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (100) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (100) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tale Of The Burning Door &#124; Tea Break</title>
		<link>http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/comment-page-2/#comment-9343</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tale Of The Burning Door &#124; Tea Break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=762#comment-9343</guid>
		<description>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (99) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (99) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jungle Book - Hindi Intro &#124; Tea Break</title>
		<link>http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/comment-page-2/#comment-9136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jungle Book - Hindi Intro &#124; Tea Break</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=762#comment-9136</guid>
		<description>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (98) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 16, 2009 &#8212; Knowledge Of The Book (98) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAWJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/comment-page-2/#comment-8656</link>
		<dc:creator>SAWJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=762#comment-8656</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;When you asked me questions - I replied from my source and gave references. When I ask you questions and seek references you tell me that I better read your books. Very constructive I must say. And is it not amazing that you have all the collection of worldy knowledge in these books and still you are asking questions?&lt;/i&gt;

Well I cannot post 300 sermons and thousands of Ahadees here can I? I only told you the names. It&#039;s up to your choice if you want to read them or not. If you want the third guy, that is.

&lt;i&gt;huh? Just a comment earlier when I had told you that God tells in 6:114 that Quran is explained in detail, you replied that “This is a very convincing argument indeed that the non-believers will
find very useful.” Now you are saying would the non-believers approve of it if they are told that Quran is explained in detail? Whats up bro? &lt;/i&gt;

I believe there has been a misunderstanding on the first comment. It was sarcasm bro.

And thanks for liking my pic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When you asked me questions &#8211; I replied from my source and gave references. When I ask you questions and seek references you tell me that I better read your books. Very constructive I must say. And is it not amazing that you have all the collection of worldy knowledge in these books and still you are asking questions?</i></p>
<p>Well I cannot post 300 sermons and thousands of Ahadees here can I? I only told you the names. It&#8217;s up to your choice if you want to read them or not. If you want the third guy, that is.</p>
<p><i>huh? Just a comment earlier when I had told you that God tells in 6:114 that Quran is explained in detail, you replied that “This is a very convincing argument indeed that the non-believers will<br />
find very useful.” Now you are saying would the non-believers approve of it if they are told that Quran is explained in detail? Whats up bro? </i></p>
<p>I believe there has been a misunderstanding on the first comment. It was sarcasm bro.</p>
<p>And thanks for liking my pic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PostMan</title>
		<link>http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/comment-page-2/#comment-8655</link>
		<dc:creator>PostMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=762#comment-8655</guid>
		<description>SAWJ - &quot;Read the Nahj-ul-Balaghah and the Usool-e-Arba&#039;a.&quot;

When you asked me questions - I replied from my source and gave references. When I ask you questions and seek references you tell me that I better read your books. Very constructive I must say. And is it not amazing that you have all the collection of worldy knowledge in these books and still you are asking questions?

SAWJ - &quot;I do but would a non-believer?&quot;

huh? Just a comment earlier when I had told you that God tells in 6:114 that Quran is explained in detail, you replied that &quot;This is a very convincing argument indeed that the non-believers will 
find very useful.&quot; Now you are saying would the non-believers approve of it if they are told that Quran is explained in detail? Whats up bro? 

And nice pic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAWJ &#8211; &#8220;Read the Nahj-ul-Balaghah and the Usool-e-Arba&#8217;a.&#8221;</p>
<p>When you asked me questions &#8211; I replied from my source and gave references. When I ask you questions and seek references you tell me that I better read your books. Very constructive I must say. And is it not amazing that you have all the collection of worldy knowledge in these books and still you are asking questions?</p>
<p>SAWJ &#8211; &#8220;I do but would a non-believer?&#8221;</p>
<p>huh? Just a comment earlier when I had told you that God tells in 6:114 that Quran is explained in detail, you replied that &#8220;This is a very convincing argument indeed that the non-believers will<br />
find very useful.&#8221; Now you are saying would the non-believers approve of it if they are told that Quran is explained in detail? Whats up bro? </p>
<p>And nice pic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAWJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/16/knowledge-of-the-book/comment-page-2/#comment-8649</link>
		<dc:creator>SAWJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=762#comment-8649</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Oh sorry. Could not resist. Who was he? Did he explain the initials?&lt;/i&gt;

Read the Nahj-ul-Balaghah and the Usool-e-Arba&#039;a.

&lt;i&gt;Don’t trust God when He says its explained in detail?&lt;/i&gt;

I do but would a non-believer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Oh sorry. Could not resist. Who was he? Did he explain the initials?</i></p>
<p>Read the Nahj-ul-Balaghah and the Usool-e-Arba&#8217;a.</p>
<p><i>Don’t trust God when He says its explained in detail?</i></p>
<p>I do but would a non-believer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
